102 The Beautiful Message Joseph Campbell Was Really Trying to Tell Us

In the last episode of Rough Draft, your host explored storytelling from a myriad of angles, culminating in a thorough vetting of Joseph Campbell’s Hero’s Journey concept.

This time we thoroughly vet Campbell, the man. And we do it with superstar Campbell scholar Robert Segal.

Professor Segal is an unstoppable fount of knowledge about Campbell and his work, particularly the Hero’s Journey.

This is a frolicking good ride for those who love myth, psychology, and storytelling. Not to mention a little treat from your host about 20 minutes in. NOT TO BE MISSED!

In this 55-minute episode you’ll discover:

  • Campbell’s habit of pitting myth against religion — and why it’s a mistake
  • Whether Campbell was more Freudian or Jungian
  • Why we shouldn’t look at Campbell as a guru
  • What myth is really about
  • The mystery of why British students are not smitten with Campbell the way Americans are
  • The thing about Campbell that frustrates Prof. Segal to no end (it’s really screwy)
  • And more!

The Show Notes

101 The Greatest Storytelling Guide This Side of Saturn

Marketers are agog over stories. For good reason …

A story lifts a person out of her ordinary world … and stories take her on a journey that ultimately leads to a vision of herself as a better version of herself.

This is marketing that educates your audience through the storytelling arc.

And one way to think about this process is episodic education. We are taking a page out of the playbook of cable television, motion pictures, commercials, radio, and animation.

But telling a good story is no easy matter. You need to know the elements that make up a great story. Which is why we marketers tend to lean on templates to tell those stories.

And one such template that we marketers are in love with is “The Hero’s Journey.”

But what is the hero’s journey? And who created it? And why should we care?

Well, in this 71-minute episode you’ll discover the answers to those questions, plus:

  • Whether storytelling has a future in a post-apocalyptic world
  • The best marketing story ever told
  • The number one reason marketers need to tell stories
  • The best framework to use when telling a story
  • 4 cute facts about Joseph Campbell just about anyone will appreciate
  • What the leading Campbell scholar thinks of The Hero’s Journey (hint: it’s tangentially related to LSD)
  • The 5 things every great marketing story needs
  • And what great rappers have in common with great stories

The Show Notes

100 The Episode That Explains the Future of Rough Draft

So, we are making a few changes here at Rough Draft. Good changes. Three in fact.

One, after this episode, I’m taking a month break. A month to clear my head. A month to plan the next 100 episodes, namely the content and the format.

Listen to this twelve minute episode to learn about the other two changes. Plus, find out what I think are the ten best shows of the last one hundred episodes (I cheat a little on this one).

This is also your opportunity to tell me what you think are your favorite shows — so we can share on episode 101.

Also, let me know how many shows you’ve listened to in a row. We all love to binge — and the short format of Rough Draft allows for a little more binging that usual!

Prize for the person who binges longest: get a mention on the show! Leave your responses on Twitter or in the comments below.

Listen now! And talk to you soon.

The Show Notes

The Episode That Explains the Future of Rough Draft

Voiceover: This is Rainmaker.FM, the digital marketing podcast network. It’s built on the Rainmaker Platform, which empowers you to build your own digital marketing and sales platform. Start your free 14-day trial at RainmakerPlatform.com.

Demian Farnworth: Howdy, and you are listening to Rough Draft, your daily dose of essential web writing advice. I am Demian Farnworth. Your host, your muse, your digital recluse, and the Chief Content Writer for Copyblogger Media.

And thank you for sharing the next few minutes of your life with me.

So, bad news. That’s the last time you are ever going to hear me say that line. Because we are making a few changes here at Rough Draft. Good changes. Three in fact.

The Three Changes Coming to Rough Draft

One, after this episode, I’m taking a month break. A month to clear my head. A month to plan the next 100 episodes, namely the content and the format.

The thing about the format is this: I’m moving away from the short episodes and into longer shows. Like in the neighborhood of 30 minutes.

I’ve covered a lot of fundamental topics in the first 100 shows, laid a solid foundation, topics that worked in the ten-minute or less range, but I find myself bumping up against that limitation, and wanting to stretch the boundaries of each show.

That’s change two. And change two naturally leads into change three: I’m moving away from the daily to weekly, and maybe even bi-weekly. Just depending on where I land on how I want the show to unfold from here on out. Because obviously I can’t manage a daily show with each show being 30 minutes give or take. I could do it, but each show would suck.

So, let’s not suck.

See, I’ve covered a lot of basic ground in the last 100. Now I need more space to meander and explore more complicated topics, more protracted subjects, like storytelling for instance. Which will be the first episode out of the gate when I get back. 101.

Now I don’t think I’m going to go Dan Carlin and Hardcore History on you and drop a three hour episode ever. But something similar. But different.

My Top 10 Most Favorite Rough Draft Episodes

Now, until then, let’s do a little celebrating of the last 100 shows, meaning we are going to revisit what I think are the ten best episodes, which really means, my ten most favorite episodes.

Now I’m going to cheat a little out of the gate and include 2 episodes in this list, episodes 3 and 4, that’s because these are actually one longer episode: I’m talking about How Search Engines Work Part One and Part Two.

I’m mighty proud of these two because it amounts to the most fun you’ll ever have talking about search engines. All you need to know about search engines as a web writer, like the cute fictional conversation search engine spiders have with each other and also a running example using people who LOVE jaguars.

Each episode is only four minutes long, so eight tops. Time well spent.

But if you’d prefer something more personal, try A Small Gift for Your Dark Days as an Obscure Writer. In that I actually read the poem “Ulysses” by Tennyson. That’s it. Gutsy, but here’s the thing: I also confess to my temptation I endured during one of my most darkest moments. It’s kind of a funny temptation Occupy Wall Street. In a grim sort of way.

Number three favorite show is How the Perfect Article Is Framed by White Space. The reason I love this episode is because the blend of monologue and music are pure magic. It was kind of the first time it really came together. I tip my hat to our sound guy, Toby Lyles, for helping me out, for encouraging me to use an underscore.

And a really close fourth place is Meet the Tragic Poster Boy for the Emotional Brain. I share my favorite story about the relationship between emotions and decision making …

It’s an amazing, gripping story about a 19th Century railroad foreman that involves dynamite and crowbars in the Vermont hills. A bit graphic, however. But I keep that part brief.

For my fifth choice The Doomsday Cult School of Specificity. I love this because you learn things like the lesson you can learn from successful doomsday cult messages
and how criminal investigators use details to tell if you are lying. And it opens with a fun story that proves my point.

And for my sixth choice I’m going to go with something a little bit technical … it’s called A 12-Minute Crash Course on Link Building (Ugh). The number one SEO practice you can employ to get people (and Google) to pay attention to your online content.

To shake things up a little, I want to share my seventh through tenth choices … where I broke the monologue mold and pulled in some of the smartest brains in online writing (all women, by the way) for a series of short interviews — about twenty minutes.

Those interviews are as follows:

All my heroes. This series is quickly becoming my favorite set of episodes. The reason is simple …

Not only do you learn from the best, but you realize that every single one of these gals started at the bottom. In other words, these episodes should give you hope in this journey to conquer obscurity and overcome neglect …

Because if average people like me, James, Erika, Stefanie, and Belle carved out careers online as a writer, so can you.

What’s Your Favorite?

So, those are my ten favorite … but what about you? You are who actually can make this show possible. You who listen. Leave comments, share on blogs and Twitter, who post ratings and reviews on iTunes … what do you think? What are your favorite episodes?

Let me know on Twitter or comments on this blog. I’ll tally up responses and then share them in episode 101.

And one other thing before I let you go: how many episodes in a row have you listened to? 10? 20? All 100? The person with the most episode listens in a row will get a mention in the next show — in show 101 — by name. Promise.

Tweet it, comment. When we come back a month from now.

So that’s it for 100. Thank you again, so much. And I look forward to seeing you on the other side of a month. By the way, I’ll still be around on Twitter, the Copyblogger blog, so let’s stay in touch.

And until then, take care.

099 A Better Way to Find Big Ideas (That Make You Stand Out)

Some astronomers and philosophers make the grand, if not absurd, claim that we are ten thousand things, but one substance. Perhaps ancient stardust. Fair enough.

I have my own absurd claim: behind one single article by a seasoned writer is the weight of one thousand books, one hundreds movies, hours of lectures, a litany of song lyrics, countless days of conversations, dozens of poems, and so on.

And it’s this sort of commitment to working, learning, and playing hard that separates the good writer from the great.

So the question to you is: how far are you willing to go to be absurd? How far are you willing to go to find that big idea. Because it is that big idea that will rise above the noise. But where do those big ideas come from? How do you find them?

Well, that is what this episode is all about. And yes, there are two ways to go about finding big, absurd ideas: passive and active.

In this 18-minute episode you’ll discover:

  • The simple thing you must do if your big idea is hiding from you
  • What a sinkhole and a great writer have in common
  • Why publishing ideas on a consistent schedule is a good thing
  • How being well-traveled can help you find that big idea
  • A lesson from a popular film director’s cutting floor
  • And more!

The Show Notes

A Better Way to Find Big Ideas (That Make You Stand Out)

Voiceover: This is Rainmaker.FM, the digital marketing podcast network. It’s built on the Rainmaker Platform, which empowers you to build your own digital marketing and sales platform. Start your free 14-day trial at RainmakerPlatform.com.

Demian Farnworth: Howdy, and you are listening to Rough Draft, your daily dose of essential web writing advice. I am Demian Farnworth. Your host, your muse, your digital recluse, and the Chief Content Writer for Copyblogger Media.

And thank you for sharing the next few minutes of your life with me.

Some astronomers and philosophers make the grand, if not absurd, claim that we are ten thousand things, but one substance.

Perhaps ancient stardust. Fair enough. To quote Harlan Ellison, “We are all entitled to our informed opinion.”

I have my own absurd claim: behind one single article by a seasoned writer is the weight of one thousand books, one hundreds movies, hours of lectures, a litany of song lyrics, countless days of conversations, dozens of poems, and so on.

And it’s this sort of commitment to working, learning, and playing hard that separates the good writer from the great.

So the question to you is: how far are you willing to go to be absurd? How far are you willing to go to find that big idea? Because it is that big idea that will rise above the noise. But where do those big ideas come from? How do you find them?

Well, that is what this episode is all about. And yes, there are two ways to go about finding big absurd ideas: passive and active.

Now, active is exactly how it sounds. You are given an assignment that requires you to chase down a particular topic. If you are like me, you pour yourself into every inch of material you can get your hands on on this particular assignment. Interview transcripts, articles, reports, research.

The more the merrier.

But there always comes a time, however, that you have to decide what is the big idea. The deadline is looming. What is the overarching angle. But that thing — what some people call the hook and we’ll simply call the big idea — it will hide from you.

The Simple Thing You Must Do If Your Big Idea is Hiding From You

That’s why I like to start by knowing the customer or audience inside out. Their dreams their hopes their fears. Then the product or topic like the back of my hand. Next I look at the surrounding environment. The competition, the government, the national scene. Then go one more to the international. Across disciplines, industries, looking for clues. My eyes wide open for clues to where that big idea is hiding.

But still. The big idea may hide from you. No. No. It will hide from you. Your big idea is like a sasquatch. It exists in grainy photos and backwood anecdotes. My advice to you is to keep hunting. You never know when you might get lucky and spot that damn beast.

What a Sinkhole and a Great Writer Have in Common

Something similar happened to me a couple years ago when I was working on a series on Google Authorship. I had my dense whiteboard outline finished, but I needed a hook.

Some uncommon theme to tie all the articles together. That theme appeared in the character of gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson.

He would become the mascot of the series. Our ideal. Our standard. The shadow that swept across every paragraph.

And I stumbled upon this idea by following a rabbit trail that terminated on his entry in Wikipedia. I had no reason to read the article. But I was curious and bored.

Besides, I had a hunch.

It was a long entry, but Thompson is enough of a wild card to even make a Wiki entry entertaining. Fortunately I landed on what I was looking for in no time, a quote about obscurity.

I pushed away from the laptop, looked at the ceiling, and smiled. “I found it. I can’t believe I found it.”

Here’s the quote:

“As things stand now, I am going to be a writer. I’m not sure that I’m going to be a good one or even a self-supporting one, but until the dark thumb of fate presses me to the dust and says, ‘you are nothing,’ I will be a writer.”

— Hunter S. Thompson

It was an accidental insight, a discovery I couldn’t control, but nurtured by way of constant curation. As if that is what my entire life is all about. The sieve engaged every moment of my waking day.

In other words, nothing is sacred. Swallow the world around you like a renegade sinkhole. You just never know where you might discover your next big idea.

And let me get this out of the way.

Why Publishing Ideas on a Consistent Schedule is a Good Thing

Some times I wish I’d not published a certain article on my site (or a guest blog) so I can publish it on Copyblogger.

While I’ll reach the largest audience there, the wait list is long, meaning I’d be sitting on more ideas than I’m comfortable with.

Thus, the conclusion I’ve come to is this: that that content is out there is a good thing. It is territory I’ve already covered …

I covered it out of necessity because the schedule demanded it and the audience needed it.

Since that idea is published, I can now move onto something else. And this is important. I can move on to a new challenge which is this: how to write something without repeating myself.

Let me repeat that: how to write something without repeating myself. How to repackage an old idea so it seems new.

Because outside of obscurity, one of my greatest fears is going stale. Falling into a rut. Repeating myself.

So publishing what I write on a regular basis forces me to stay fresh. To limit over thinking and encourage more writing. It forces me to come up with new ideas.

And even if I don’t always succeed, I’m still practicing. Still clocking those hours. And the more ideas you clock, the more big ideas you can actually generate.

How Being Well-Traveled Can Help You Find That Big Idea

Speaking of, ideas also emerge through interaction with the world. The real world. The flesh and blood one outside your door where cobblestone streets and switchback trails and coffee houses and ferris wheels exist. Loaded with people. Strange and familiar.

Jeff Goins says the discipline of traveling to another country disrupts our comfort, educates us in other cultures, and can help us find new ways to solve old problems. That’s curation we can control. Active curation. Traveling will open you up to big ideas.

Then there are curation opportunities we can’t control.

Twentieth century Russian novelist Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn says of his time in Stalin’s corrective labor camps, “Bless you, prison!” An experience that nearly broke this man granted him a knowledge of how “a human being becomes good or evil.”

His years of forced imprisonment became fields ripe for harvest.

“Own only what you can always carry with you: know languages, know countries, know people. Let your memory be your travel bag.” ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Chances are you’ll never rot for a decade in a gulag. And most of your experiences won’t kill you or anyone close to you. But if you’ve at least made it to your twenty-first birthday, as Flannery O’Connor was fond of saying, then you’ll have a lifetime of material.

A lifetime of material at twenty-one. A life-time.

Here’s the thing: don’t be afraid of the world. Or the people or circumstances you can’t control. Odd as it seems now, that junk — the trials and heartache, the hurt and trouble — will one day become your creative cache. Life will suck when you are in it. But the other side is seasoned with meaning and truth if you are willing to fight for it.

Lessons, baby. Lessons. Keep in mind that while you are about the world looking for new, big ideas, don’t forget to look underneath the table.

Let me explain what I mean.

A Lesson from a Popular Film Director’s Cutting Floor

Johnny Depp, based on his performance in the television crime drama 21 Jump Street, acted in Oliver Stone’s anti-war movie Platoon. This included two major dialog scenes with William Defoe. You might be scratching your head and saying wait a minute: Johnny Depp wasn’t in Platoon. You are correct, because those sections of the film, fell to the cutting room floor, victim of Oliver Stones’ ruthless editing.

This is not unusual.

Directors cut scenes for many reasons: a subplot doesn’t push the story forward, a scene disrupts pacing, or the director has entirely too much material.

But deleted scenes aren’t thrown out. Instead, they are labeled and stored for later use.

Writer, you, too, have deleted scenes. Content that hits the cutting room floor. Don’t give up on it. Repurpose it.

  • Fish through cut material when looking for new ideas.
  • Keep a series alive with related chunks from the past.
  • Resurrect once two-bit content when the topic finally becomes hot (for whatever reason).

And where do you find your cut material?

  • Look through your revision files on WordPress (section just below your text editor).
  • Label Word documents different versions as you rewrite, keeping a history of the changes, the deletions.
  • Dig through old emails to find older versions of your documents you sent to a friend or editor.

Who knows, you might find an idea you once thought lost.

So let me end with this little story: long ago I was in the middle of an article that was filling out at around 1,300 words. At the time I was about two-thirds of the way done. I still needed to close it, and I had a pretty good idea on how I was going to do that.

But there was one problem: a glaring hole in the middle of the article. It wasn’t really that big. I mean I could have brushed it aside, and moved on, but in my mind I was searching for the right word. The right metaphor. To fill that hole.

And I wouldn’t settle for anything less. I was determined to find it.

For some reason I got the bright idea I would watch Apocalypse Now: 1979 the American war film set in Vietnam, which was a take on Joseph Conrad’s novel Hearts of Darkness.

The movie directed by Francis Ford Coppala, starring Martin Sheen, Marlon Brando, Robert Duvell, and a young Dennis Hopper playing a gabby photo-journalist.

It was actually a Hopper monologue that I heard sampled in a song by American a producer/remixer Greg Scanavino called “Over and Out.” Let me see if I can do justice to the monologue:

“Do you know that ‘if’ is the middle word in life? If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you, if you can trust yourself when all men doubt you”… I mean I’m… no, I can’t… I’m a little man.

Do you remember the scene? The line? Well it was that monologue that seeded my mind with the movie Apocalypse Now. And so that day when I was writing that 1,300 word article, I thought perhaps my metaphor was in there. The crazy thing is, that’s a 2 hour and 38 minute movie.

A 2 hour and 38 minute movie. Would it be worth it? For one metaphor? Perhaps.

And just to let you in on a little secret, I did not find the metaphor in that movie. But I don’t regret seeing it. Because some day down the road — a scene, a character from that movie — will fall into my lap at the right moment. It could be 2 years down the road.

That’s exactly what happened with the opening to the article “How to be an exceptional writer.” A scene from the documentary called it might get loud — the scene where older Jack White is counseling the younger Jack White that he had to fight the guitar and he had to win. The moment I heard that line I knew I need to use it. But it didn’t find a home until two years later.

Here’s the deal: How far are you willing to go to find the perfect word? Sentence? Metaphor? How far have you gone in the past? Nothing is ever wasted. You never know when you might get lucky. You never know when you might need long-forgotten material left on the cutting room floor.

Do me a favor, share examples of the great lengths you went to to find a big idea … .

By the way, stick around for the next episode. it’s episode 100. A big milestone in the life of Rough Draft. And like everything else in life changes are afoot.

Good changes, I promise. I’ll explain more tomorrow. Until then, take care.

098 How to Grab Great Ideas (Without Using Your Hands)

It’s funny. How we forget things. Sublime reflections and exalted ideas. Like they were never even there. But if they were so sublime and exalted, why did they not remain with us?

And it’s funny how we fear losing these ideas. The lengths we will go to preserve them. The legends are legion.

Keeping waterproof slates in your shower. Talking into your phone’s voice memo while you pump gas on a dusty August day. Scribbling in your tiny notepad in the dark of night so you don’t wake your spouse. In the morning light, however, the handwriting is illegible. You might have well been drunk.

I know. I’ve done it.

But at what point do you draw the line when it comes to stopping what you are doing to record an idea: how many times do you interrupt the family dinner? The mowing of the lawn? The cross-country run? How many times do you wake up in the middle of the night to write that rare never before thought idea down in your diary?

Not to mention, there’s the risk you may interrupt the full blossoming of an idea if you prematurely stop what you are doing to write it down.

Well, this is what do you do when you can’t — or don’t — want to stop to write down an idea

In this 8-minute episode you’ll discover:

  • Margaret Atwood’s 10 rules for writing
  • What to do if you want to memorize something
  • How to let an idea unfold by concocting a narrative
  • And more!

The Show Notes

How to Grab Great Ideas (Without Using Your Hands)

Voiceover: This is Rainmaker.FM, the digital marketing podcast network. It’s built on the Rainmaker Platform, which empowers you to build your own digital marketing and sales platform. Start your free 14-day trial at RainmakerPlatform.com.

Demian Farnworth: Howdy, and you are listening to Rough Draft, your daily dose of essential web writing advice. I am Demian Farnworth. Your host, your muse, your digital recluse, and the Chief Content Writer for Copyblogger Media.

And thank you for sharing the next few minutes of your life with me.

It’s funny. How we forget things. Sublime reflections and exalted ideas. Like they were never even there. But if they were so sublime and exalted, why did they not remain with us?

And it’s funny how we fear losing these ideas. The lengths we will go to preserve them. The legends are legion.

Keeping waterproof slates in your shower. Talking into your phone’s voice memo while you pump gas on a dusty August day. Scribbling in your tiny notepad in the dark of night so you don’t wake your spouse. In the morning light, however, the handwriting is illegible. You might have well been drunk.

I know. I’ve done it.

The First Four Rules of Margaret Atwood’s 10 Rules of Writing

Look at the first four rules of Margaret Atwood’s 10 rules for writing:

  1. Take a pencil to write with on aeroplanes. Pens leak. But if the pencil breaks, you can’t sharpen it on the plane, because you can’t take knives with you. Therefore: take two pencils.
  2. If both pencils break, you can do a rough sharpening job with a nail file of the metal or glass type.
  3. Take something to write on. Paper is good. In a pinch, pieces of wood or your arm will do.
  4. If you’re using a computer, always safeguard new text with a ­memory stick.

These are all about preserving your work, your ideas. That’s forty percent. The other rules, the ones devoted to the craft of writing, have to share the remaining sixty. Think about that.

The premium we place on ideas.

But at what point do you draw the line when it comes to stopping what you are doing to record an idea: how many times do you interrupt the family dinner? The mowing of the lawn? The cross-country run? How many times do you wake up in the middle of the night to write that rare never before thought idea down in your diary?

Not to mention, there’s the risk you may interrupt the full blossoming of an idea if you prematurely stop what you are doing to write it down.

Well, this is what do you do when you can’t — or don’t — want to stop to write down an idea: either memorize it or concoct a narrative around it.

Let me show you how these work.

What to Do If You Want to Memorize Something

Memorize the idea means nothing more than repeating it until you burn it in your memory. Perhaps it was a cute little sentence that will be perfect for opening up an article. Repeat it over and over again. Just like you would memorize any other fact.

How to Let an Idea Unfold By Concocting a Narrative

Concocting a narrative means nothing more than allowing the idea to unfold. For instance, the roads I run on are surrounded by woods and farm fields. We are outside of city limits. We are in the country. And people shoot guns in the country.

I don’t go a day without hearing a shot fired. Somewhere far away, of course. Maybe they’re scaring away a coyote or banging a quail. Nevertheless, near enough to send my brain into a creative rampage. And the only way I can corral these ideas is to embed them into a story — with vivid milestones.

When I get home I take a shower and eat breakfast. When I finally sit down at my desk I open one of my notebooks, mechanical pencil in hand, and use those milestones to walk my way back to the original idea. That’s concocting a narrative to save an idea from oblivion.

What Happens When We Hoard Ideas

Now let’s address something else that occurs. We hoard ideas so we don’t have to deal with the blank page. And we accumulate, store, and organize those ideas.

Some of us are better at this than others. If you are like me, then you are a vacuum. Nothing is sacred. You swallow the world around you like a renegade sink hole.

Books, articles, videos, movies, songs, images, conversations. The best of us can’t keep up with it all. It is the back of a cereal box at breakfast. An American Scientific article in the bathroom. A TED talk while you sit in your dentist’s chair. So many ideas you are stuffing into your brain, and then stuffing into your notebooks.

Then there’s the stack of notebooks. The stack of notecards. Napkins and sheets of paper covered with drawings, concepts, and objectives stuffed into a leather legal portfolio.

Yet we still stare at the blank page. Disabled in the face of so much material. Material that seems, after re-reading, weird at best. Wasn’t there something more profound than this?

Possibly that profoundness is still in your head. Buried. All you need to do is kick up the dirt. By picking up your journal or opening your laptop and writing: “I had this idea. Now it doesn’t seem very good, but there was something else … oh, yeah ….”

A page later and a catalog of good ideas are marching toward you.

Trust the Process

Here’s the moral of the story: trust the process. The mind engaged will pillage the ideas in your head. It’s an act of discovery. And the act of writing initiates it.

So don’t torment yourself over lost ideas. You can find them. Just trust the process.

Take care, and until next time.

097 The Problem with the ‘Hell-For-Leather’ Writing Movement

As of late, it’s fashionable to write hell for leather. In fact, there’s a hot cottage industry in the writing culture. But is it good for the writing community? Or detrimental?

For lack of potentially better terms, let’s call this trend the “The Hell-For-Leather Writing Movement.” Or HFLWM.

You see, HFLWM in titles like “How to Write Fast,” “Write an Article in 20 Minutes,” and “How Fast Can You Write?”

The growing content demands and aggressive editorial schedules shove this thinking into our face. But it gets empirical with 5 Personal Writing Metrics Every Content Marketer Should Track by Nate Baker at Raven.

And it also gets personal.

In this 7-minute episode you’ll discover:

  • If tracking your writing makes you write faster
  • Why it’s a bad idea to compare writing to walking
  • A more reasonable stretch goal than “writing faster”
  • When writing faster is appropriate
  • The perfect metaphor that describes how a serious writer revises
  • And more!

The Show Notes

The Problem with the ‘Hell-For-Leather’ Writing Movement

Voiceover: This is Rainmaker.FM, the digital marketing podcast network. It’s built on the Rainmaker Platform, which empowers you to build your own digital marketing and sales platform. Start your free 14-day trial at RainmakerPlatform.com.

Demian Farnworth: Howdy, and you are listening to Rough Draft, your daily dose of essential web writing advice. I am Demian Farnworth. Your host, your muse, your digital recluse, and the Chief Content Writer for Copyblogger Media.

And thank you for sharing the next few minutes of your life with me.

It took me six hours in six days to write this post. It’s less than 430 words. That’s about 1.2 words per minute. Is there something wrong with me?

And that’s not counting the time I spent thinking about this article.

As of late it’s fashionable to write hell for leather. In fact, there’s a hot cottage industry in the writing culture. For lack of better terms, let’s’ call it the “The Hell-For-Leather Writing Movement.”

Or HFLWM.

You see it in titles like “How to Write Fast,” “Write an Article in 20 Minutes,” and “How Fast Can You Write?” Content demands shove this thinking into our face. But it gets empirical with 5 Personal Writing Metrics Every Content Marketer Should Track by Nate Baker at Raven.

Could Tracking Your Writing Make You Write Faster

The genesis of his metrics is interesting: Baker noticed that he walked faster and longer as he tracked his miles with a FitBit. He then postulated: “If I track my writing, perhaps I’ll write faster and more often.”

His month-long experiment confirmed as much.

First blush and this is charming stuff. Speed up your writing production and you could write two articles a day instead of one … you could write two novels during November instead of one. Who wouldn’t want that?

Win for HFLWM.

After further reflection, though, you have to wonder: is this even a reasonable goal for a writer?

There is a temptation to say “yes” because of research like this: exceptional individual contributors set stretch goals and adopt high standards for themselves.

But we’ll address concerns with this research in a minute. Let’s deal with the problems behind Baker’s idea first.

Why It’s a Bad Idea to Compare Writing to Walking

First off, it’s not even fair to compare walking to writing. They are two completely different activities. Walking is pretty basic. Step, stride, balance, repeat. Writing, on the other hand, is not.

If you want to compare a physical activity with writing best use ballet or boxing. Both require years of training for brief moments in the spotlight. Both are deemed art. It would be irresponsible to do either “faster.”

A Place for Writing Faster

Don’t get me wrong: there is a place for writing fast. It’s located in your rough draft. Or when you have more work than time. Writing more articles a day is just one stretch goal you could set, yet is that even a legitimate higher standard? Quantity of words?

Better yet: Is it clear? Concise? Compelling? Of course that takes time.

If procrastination is the issue, then set a deadline. And improve your typing speed. That will the get rough draft down on paper faster.

The Perfect Metaphor that Describes How a Serious Writer Revises

Revision, however, will be time-consuming labor because creativity and efficiency are like water and oil. They do not mix. Listen. Editing a long document is sort of like shoveling snow off a sidewalk while it is still snowing.

It begins with a foot of snow (you dump a rough draft on to the blank page). You start to shovel (edit) down the sidewalk (page). You reach the end of the sidewalk (page), wipe your brow with your cap, and look behind you.

My goodness, you didn’t realize it started snowing while you were still shoveling (in other words, it hardly looks like your editing job put a dent in your rough draft).

You must keep shoveling. Pushing. Smoothing out the transition from one point to the next. Substituting words for stronger verbs. If you don’t do this revision work, you’ll have a clunky document. You have fragments ideas stitched together without any larger coherent pattern that brings them all together. You have what looks like web writing outsourced to foreign writers.

A great document is seamless. Smooth. Fluid. Like a country road that rolls over the hills and bends through the turns like the landscape has known nothing else. It feels effortless. Yet, is anything but. Because revision takes time. It can’t be hurried.

So much for HFLWM.

Until next time. Take care.

Coming soon …

096 Why These Famous Time-Management Techniques Are Ruining Your Productivity

Most creative people will take your head off if you butt in while they are flowing. Man. That’s for good reason.

But that’s exactly what the Pomodoro technique does, a popular time management trick designed to boost your productivity.

The concept is simple: set a kitchen timer for 25 minutes and work until it rings. Then take a short break.

Eugene Schwartz swore by a similar method. He gunned for 33.33 minutes (not sure how he managed the .33 part given he wasn’t using a digital clock — I guess he eyeballed it).

During those 33 plus minutes he could do anything he wanted: stare out the window, drink coffee, drool on his wrist, or write the ad.

The hitch? He couldn’t leave his seat for nothing.

The hope was he’d get so bored he’d just write. And soon enough that’s what would happen.

And now, fortunately, this burst of focus time is getting longer. And that’s a good thing.

In this 5-minute episode you’ll discover:

  • The rule of 52 and 17 (it’s random, but supposed to up your productivity)
  • How resumption lag ruins productivity
  • Why it’s important to find a rhythm that fits your disposition
  • And more!

The Show Notes

Why These Famous Time-Management Techniques Are Ruining Your Productivity

Voiceover: This is Rainmaker.FM, the digital marketing podcast network. It’s built on the Rainmaker Platform, which empowers you to build your own digital marketing and sales platform. Start your free 14-day trial at RainmakerPlatform.com.

Demian Farnworth: Howdy, and you are listening to Rough Draft, your daily dose of essential web writing advice. I am Demian Farnworth. Your host, your muse, your digital recluse, and the Chief Content Writer for Copyblogger Media.

And thank you for sharing the next few minutes of your life with me.

Maybe it’s a control issue. I do not like the thought of being told to stop writing. I do not like being interrupted. Especially by a machine. And I’m not alone in this.

Most creative people will take your head off if you butt in while they are flowing. Man.

But that’s exactly what the Pomodoro Technique does, a time management trick designed to boost your productivity.

The concept is simple: set a kitchen timer for 25 minutes and work until it rings. Then take a short break.

Eugene Schwartz swore by a similar method. He gunned for 33.33 minutes (not sure how he managed the .33 part given he wasn’t using a digital clock — I guess he eyeballed it).

During those 33 plus minutes he could do anything he wanted: stare out the window, drink coffee, drool on his wrist, or write the ad.

The hitch? He couldn’t leave his seat for nothing.

The hope was he’d get so bored he’d just write. And soon enough that’s what would happen.

This burst of focus time is getting longer.

The Rule of 52 and 17 (It’s Random, but Supposed to Up Your Productivity)

Julia Gifford and her crew studied the habits of the most effective people and spotted what they thought was the productivity sweet spot: fifty-two minutes on, and seventeen minutes off.

The headline says it all: “The Rule of 52 and 17: It’s Random But It Ups Your Productivity.” The article, however, focuses less on the 52 and more on the 17. It’s the breaks she emphasizes that make us more productive.

I’m down with that.

And the fifty-two minutes sounds more like my style, but still, don’t interrupt me. Let me keep pushing and pushing until the end of that article. It could be my first draft or my thirtieth revision.

Sometimes it’s a straight four-and-a-half hours on, and an hour off. Yes, sans bathroom break.

How Resumption Lag Ruins Productivity

Why? Resumption lag: “the time that is needed to collect one’s thoughts and restart a task once the interruption is over,” as studied by Erik M. Altmann from the Department of Psychology at Michigan State University and J. Gregory Trafton with the Naval Research Laboratory.

And if it takes roughly sixteen minutes to resume work, then under the Pomodoro regime you’ve only got nine minutes of focused time. Under the Schwartz scheme you have a little longer, say seventeen minutes. And much longer if you follow the average from Gifford’s study.

Why It’s Important to Find a Rhythm that Fits Your Disposition

The point of this post is two-fold, though. One, find a rhythm that fits your disposition. And two, focus for long periods of time. See if you’re not a more efficient writer in the end.

Until next time. Take care.

095 Freaking Out Over the Thought of Writing a First Draft? Try Scaffolding

Your idea stretches out to the end of nowhere. One hundred words? One thousand? What’s the angle? The structure?

That’s just one decision among many you must make before you write. And just one more decision that adds to your anxiety.

Fail to figure this one out and your idea sits idle. Deserted. Should this indecision persist, over time you’ll accumulate a storehouse of hollowed out concepts. Your very own creative blight.

Fortunately, scaffolding can help you avoid this mess.

In this 7-minute episode you’ll discover:

  • A gimmick to trick yourself into taming even the craziest ideas
  • 8 scaffolding topics you can use right now
  • Scaffolding in action
  • And more!

The Show Notes

Freaking Out Over the Thought of Writing a First Draft? Try Scaffolding …

Voiceover: This is Rainmaker.FM, the digital marketing podcast network. It’s built on the Rainmaker Platform, which empowers you to build your own digital marketing and sales platform. Start your free 14-day trial at RainmakerPlatform.com.

Demian Farnworth: Howdy, and you are listening to Rough Draft, your daily dose of essential web writing advice. I am Demian Farnworth. Your host, your muse, your digital recluse, and the Chief Content Writer for Copyblogger Media.

And thank you for sharing the next few minutes of your life with me.

Your idea stretches out to the end of nowhere. One hundred words? One thousand? What’s the angle? The structure?

That’s just one decision among many you must make before you write. And just one more decision that adds to your anxiety.

Fail to figure this one out and your idea sits idle. Deserted. Should this indecision persist, over time you’ll accumulate a storehouse of hollowed out concepts. Your very own creative blight.

Fortunately, scaffolding can help you avoid this mess.

A Gimmick to Trick Yourself into Taming Even the Craziest Ideas

Scaffolding is a notion I learned from Zadie Smith, the British novelist, during a 2008 commencement speech given to students at Columbia University’s writing program.

The lecture is called “That Crafty Feeling” and you can find it in her book Changing My Mind: Occasional Essays.

In that speech she said when writing a novel (but this can apply to articles, blog posts, or even sales letters) you should use a framework. She called it a scaffolding. And she said why:

“Use it to divide what seems like an endless, unmarked journey.”

Think of it as a gimmick to trick yourself into thinking there’s a larger order to the project. Scaffolding allows you to take that burden, that pressure of figuring out where this is going off of your shoulders and lets you just focus on the writing. The words.

8 Scaffolding Topics You Can Use Right Now

In other words, scaffolding gives it parameters. Create an endgame goal. Artificial or not.

But what sort of parameters?

  • This could be Joseph Campbell’s A Hero’s Journey structure, where you have the hero, the goal, the conflict, the mentor, and the moral.
  • Your favorite number, say seven (where you limit your blog post to only seven paragraphs, sentences, or words).
  • A model of the number of days in a year.
  • A formula like Problem-Agitate-Solve.
  • The three acts of a movie.

In her book “Process“, Sara Stodola says that Zadie Smith has a list of potential ideas she could use as scaffolding:

  • The liner notes to the Beatles’ White Album
  • The speeches of Donald Rumsfield
  • And a chapter each on the books of the prophets in the Old Testament.
  • Scaffolding will help you get started and give you a point of reference before the writing takes over. It’s catalyst, not the backbone.

Your choice. However: you must always remove any trace of the framework. You must make it your own.

Scaffolding in Action

For instance, you could use the 5 Ws to work through your first draft. Let’s say you wrote a piece about why you no longer get drunk.

In a normal setting you would open with the who. You re-arrange it to open with the why. And in the body you blend the four others (plus the how) into a list of examples, so that each entry you listed what you drank, who you drank with, where you drank, how you drank, and when you drank.

  • I drank dollar cranberry vodkas to excess on Tuesday nights in an empty dance club.
  • I drank wine spritzers to excess in a hotel room on Wrightsville beach during summer break with people from high school.

You can mix up that formula to kill monotony. Then you close it out with a conclusion.

When someone reads your article they won’t read it and think you are using the five Ws, unless she trains her eyes on it. Otherwise it looks fresh, like yours.

So, what scaffolding are you going to use today to get that rough draft out of you and on paper?

Let me know on Twitter, these comments. And if you haven’t yet, leave me a rating and review on iTunes. It’s a great way to show your support of this show.

Until next time, take care.

094 How to Avoid Obscurity by Misusing Language

Language is software (your brain, the hardware). A form of coding. It communicates information, and ideas travel from one person to the next through language.

As babies, our first goal is to learn the language. Master the fundamentals. Learn your scales. And most of us are fully satisfied with this.

Great writers, however, aren’t.

They go on to experiment with language. Bend it to their will. Manhandle it. Even misuse it.

In this 7-minute episode you’ll discover:

  • What great composers have always known about greatness
  • The quirks of 3 great writers
  • What you must do before you misuse the software
  • And more!

The Show Notes

How to Avoid Obscurity by Misusing Language

Voiceover: This is Rainmaker.FM, the digital marketing podcast network. It’s built on the Rainmaker Platform, which empowers you to build your own digital marketing and sales platform. Start your free 14-day trial at RainmakerPlatform.com.

Demian Farnworth: Howdy, and welcome back to Rough Draft, your daily dose of essential web writing advice. I am Demian Farnworth. Your host, your muse, your digital recluse, and the Chief Content Writer for Copyblogger Media.

And thank you for sharing the next few minutes of your life with me.

This week we are on a roll talking about free web apps that you can use. They are optional, but they are free. To help you write clear. To help you write concise. To help you write conversational copy. To help you build a better style, and voice. And you write in such a way that when people do notice your writing, they actually pay attention.

We talked about the Hemingway App. We talked about Google Translate, as a way to have someone read your copy.

Yesterday, we talked about using your personal email to help you develop a conversational tone in your copy.

Today, we are just going to talk about turning language on its head and using it as a way to develop a quirk, or a unique writing style. It’s kind of this thought of like language is a software, and so you are going to misuse that software.

Let’s get started.

The Misuse of Software

My new favorite podcast is Song Exploder.

According to the tag line, it is “a podcast where musicians take apart their songs, and piece by piece, tell the story of how they were made.”

The best episode in my opinion (and I think many people will agree with me) is the one where John Roderick (singer and songwriter for The Long Winters) deconstructs his haunting piece “The Commander Thinks Aloud.”

However, the episode that concerns us is “Plastic Soul” by YACHT. (I love the ALL CAPS.)

Claire and Jona from YACHT describe the song as a fun neo-disco piece about human suffering (that’s certainly one way to think about it) inspired by technology and French disco singer Amanda Lear.

But I’m not so much concerned even about the song.

What I care about is how Jona spoke about the ways to make great noises. Jona’s precise quote was to “misuse the software.” I love that idea. Let’s explore it.

Language is a software (the brain is the hardware). A form of coding. It communicates information, and ideas travel from one person to the next through language.

As babies, our first goal is to learn the language. Master the fundamentals. Learn our scales. And most of us our satisfied with this.

Great writers, however, aren’t.

What Great Composers Have Always Known About Greatness

They go on to experiment with language. Bend it to their will. Manhandle it. Even misuse it.

Great music composers know this. Debussy proved that there could be tension in timelessness. Stravinsky turned genteel men into brawlers over discordant sounds. But so do writers. They misuse the software.

The Quirks of 3 Great Writers

Joyce with his stream of consciousness. Hemingway with his severe economy of words. David Foster Wallace running riot with footnotes. Writers who, because of their misuse of the software, have not sunk below the surface of obscurity. They’ve maintained relevancy in a world overwhelmed by content and a world competitive, and cut throat for attention. They’ve remained in the public’s eye because their misuse of the software. Finding a fundamental that they could mess with and misuse it.

Those writers might seem like a strange kind of group to choose from when we are talking about web writing but I went to the extreme so you see that really it is about going to the extreme because you can write in such a way that you get attention. And attention is fleeting, and it is fragmentary, and has a short shelf life.

Or you can write in such a way that gets attention and that you keep that attention because people are in awe and wonder about your writing style, and your way with words, and the way you craft and create things.

Keep in mind, one glitch in the language will not appeal to all people. Your love of a certain writing quirk will be unique to you. Thus, land upon it, and it becomes your trademark.

But you have to understand how the software is used at first. Only then can you truly misuse the software. Otherwise it’s chaos.

That’s it for today. Until next time. Take care.

093 A Creative Email Trick for Becoming a Plain Spoken Writer

Writing is weird. Unlike speaking, it’s not something we do naturally. And unless we train ourselves out of it, that weirdness renders some creative, but wooden and dense prose.

Speaking is a natural act. Every single human being has the ability to do it. And at a very young age. The reason why, says cognitive scientist and linguist Stephen Pinker, is because we have a language instinct.

We master this instinct as we imitate sounds made by mom and dad, brother and sister, nana and popo.

Soon we are forming one word sentences, then two and three words sentences, and, at around age two, we are demanding to put our seat belts on ourselves while “you worry about yourself.”

Writing, however, is another story.

In this 7-minute episode you’ll discover:

  • How Pulitzer-prize winning journalist David Leonhardt kicked the wordslaw habit
  • Voice-to-text tools that can help you write like you speak
  • Quaint quote by Charles Darwin about our lack of instinct to write
  • The age of writing
  • And more!

A Creative Email Trick for Becoming a Plain Spoken Writer

Voiceover: This is Rainmaker.FM, the digital marketing podcast network. It’s built on the Rainmaker Platform, which empowers you to build your own digital marketing and sales platform. Start your free 14-day trial at RainmakerPlatform.com.

Demian Farnworth: Howdy, and you are listening to Rough Draft, your daily dose of essential web writing advice. I am Demian Farnworth. Your host, your muse, your digital recluse, and the Chief Content Writer for Copyblogger Media.

And thank you for sharing the next few minutes of your life with me.

Speaking is a natural act. Every single human being has the ability to do it. And at a very young age. The reason why, says cognitive scientist and linguist Stephen Pinker is because we have a language instinct.

We master this instinct as we imitate sounds made by mom and dad, brother and sister, nana and popo. Soon we are forming one-word sentences, then two and three words sentences, and, at around age two, we are demanding to put our seat belts on ourselves while “you worry about yourself.”

Writing, however, is another story.

The Age of Writing

Man has an indistinctive tendency to speak, as we see in the babble of our young children, whereas no child has an instinctive tendency to bake, brew or write. – Charles Darwin

Because writing is a recent invention (roughly 5,200 years old), it’s not instinctual and has to be encouraged and taught. And for anyone who has learned to write — or teaches young writers — we all know that’s not easy. Writing is hard because it is not natural. And this unnaturalness usually shows up in wobbly, demented prose.

This can be overcome, however, by writing with a conversational tone. In other words, writing like you speak. But the funny thing is … when we sit down to type out a post or book or sales letter … we tighten up, balk, and blame the weather-breakfast-horoscope.

There are several reasons for this.

One, who wouldn’t stall when faced with the reality that, unlike spoken words, written words become permanent public fixtures once we publish them? From that moment onward we face criticism and ridicule.

Not so with speech. It’s transitory nature makes it pretty tempting to pop off whatever is on our mind with little fear for fall out. How often have you, six months or six years down the road, said, “Dang, I wish I’d never said that”?

The other reason we get stiff when we think about writing is that it really is not a natural act. Unlike the act of speaking, where you are face-to-face with another person, when you sit down (or stand up if that’s your thing) to write, you’ve entered the land of make believe: you have to pretend like you are talking to someone when you’re not. We call people who do that, lunatics (eccentric if they have a lot of money in the bank).

And that weirdness renders some creative, but wooden and dense prose. “I have an indispensable attraction with the fabric enveloping your hip region.” You mean you like her skirt?

How Pulitzer-Prize Winning Journalist David Leonhardt Kicked the Wordslaw Habit

Pulitzer-prize winning journalist David Leonhardt (now editor of NY Times’ The Upshot) was no stranger to wordslaw when he began his career. So for several months he wrote all of his rough drafts in Yahoo Mail instead of Microsoft Word and trained himself to be a plain-spoken writer. And it’s probably safe to say he imagined he was in a conversation when he wrote those rough drafts.

Voice-to-Text Tools that Can Help You Write Like You Speak

Of course, instead of writing a rough draft, you could use your phone’s voice memo or software like Dragon Naturally Speaking that turns voice into text. And again, I think the upgraded version of Evernote does this too. You record your voice and it sends it to text.

Again, just pretend you are talking to someone else. That’s really the goal you are after. You don’t have to use email but if it helps, use your email account. Think conversational. Think like you are talking to one person.

By the way, there’s a nice side benefit to this approach. You’ll naturally work in your own voice and style into your prose. When you are not worried about this going public. When it seems this is just a private email that you are going to share between two good friends, your voice and your style will emerge.

And don’t forget to read what you wrote out loud, and maybe even think about running it through the Hemingway App.

Until next time.